To find
, write each term as
. Then ![]()
This is analogous to integration:
.
And practically exactly the same thing as the finite calculus version of integration, summation.
All series are telescoping series!
e.g.
Find the sum of
.
To convert this to a telescoping series, we need to find a way of expressing each term as
.
Maybe the e.g.
term can be extended in both directions,
and
, and expressed as the difference of multiples of these, i.e.
and
.
Noting that
, we can use the multiply by 1 cleverly tool to find the desired expression.

In terms of falling powers, as is usual in finite calculus:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[\sum_{x=1}^n \fp{x}{2}=\frac{\fp{(n+1)}{3}}{3}\]](https://www.adamponting.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-a94c53f2f660b8b1ea5769a54deb1a2e_l3.png)
(This is the finite calculus version of the more familiar
.)
Applications etc
Common ad nauseam in the telescoping literature is the one arising from
, which I was thus going to avoid here, until I found an interesting version due to Marc Frantz.

The
th telephone pole appears at
. From the side ratios of similar triangles we get:

The
th gap, between
and
, is: ![]()
The poles appear between
and
, i.e. the sum of the series (of gaps) is
.

Partial sums of a geometric series
.
If
, then
. If
, then

If
then
as
, and the series converges to
.

We need an expression with
and
terms, for some function
.
Since
, and
, we expect
to be an expression in
, so try that.

First find

useful identities

more
Telescoping Sums, Series and Products at cut-the-knot.org
Paul Zeitz – The Art and Craft of Problem Solving
Thomas Osler – Some Long Telescoping Series
J. Marshall Ash and Stefan Catoiu – Telescoping, rational-valued series, and zeta functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 357 (2005), p3339-58 PDF
Marc Frantz – The Telescoping Series in Perspective, Mathematics Magazine, Vol. 71, No. 4, Oct 1998